“SecureOS cut our code review time dramatically. We found a critical dependency issue in one afternoon that used to take our team days to trace manually.”
One workspace for your whole team. Every finding traced to a real attack path, every fix verified before it ships.
Scans, issues, pull request reviews and supply chain — the same view your team triages from. This is the actual interface, not an illustration of it.
| Severity | Issue | Location | Agent | Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL | SQL injection in invoice lookup | acme/api · billing/invoice.ts:88 | appsec | 2h |
| CRITICAL | IDOR on document download | acme/api · docs/fetch.ts:41 | appsec | 2h |
| HIGH | SSRF via user-supplied callback URL | acme/api · proxy/handler.ts:23 | appsec | 5h |
| HIGH | Missing auth on internal metrics route | acme/web · routes/metrics.ts:12 | recon | 1d |
| MEDIUM | Secret committed in CI config | acme/infra · .github/deploy.yml:7 | cipher | 1d |
| MEDIUM | Dependency with known CVE | acme/web · package-lock.json | warden | 2d |
A security tool is only useful if you trust what it tells you. Every claim SecureOS makes is one it can back up.
Connect a repository and SecureOS reviews each pull request before it merges, commenting findings inline where the code changed.
A finding is an attack path, not a grep hit. SecureOS traces entry to sink across files and shows every hop with its file and line.
A fix is labelled verified only when the vulnerability is re-tested and gone. When that can't be proven, it says so instead of guessing.
Lockfiles are attack surface. Malicious packages, typosquats and compromised versions are checked alongside your own code.
Comprehension runs in the background when you connect, so the first scan already knows your architecture instead of guessing at it.
Not every repository needs every check. The plan is chosen from what your code actually contains, and the skipped steps are named.
Invite your team, give them roles, and everyone triages the same findings — with the reasoning attached, in the places you already work.
Everyone in the workspace sees the same findings and the same triage, so nobody spends an afternoon on something a colleague dismissed last week.
Accept a risk and the note travels with it, under the name of whoever made the call — so the next person reads the answer instead of working it out again.
Findings arrive as comments on the pull request that introduced them, and one Slack message per scan — only when something an entry point reaches got worse.
From engineering teams at Tower Tech to faculty teaching secure development at Punjab Group of Colleges.
“SecureOS cut our code review time dramatically. We found a critical dependency issue in one afternoon that used to take our team days to trace manually.”
“The tool gave us clear, path-based findings and helped our engineers fix issues before deployment. It turned security review into a normal part of delivery.”
“We used SecureOS to review student projects and internal lab code. It surfaced weak patterns quickly and saved our faculty hours of manual security checks.”
“The security findings were not generic warnings. They were actionable, explainable, and easy to teach to students and junior developers.”
“SecureOS cut our code review time dramatically. We found a critical dependency issue in one afternoon that used to take our team days to trace manually.”
“The tool gave us clear, path-based findings and helped our engineers fix issues before deployment. It turned security review into a normal part of delivery.”
“We used SecureOS to review student projects and internal lab code. It surfaced weak patterns quickly and saved our faculty hours of manual security checks.”
“The security findings were not generic warnings. They were actionable, explainable, and easy to teach to students and junior developers.”